Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

THE ITIL BOOKS

The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:
HERE

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: OmerGonsal
New Today: 8
New Yesterday: 31
Overall: 231512

People Online:
Visitors: 121
Members: 0
Total: 121

Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

How to set up
IT Change Management
Process Info-Graphic

NOTE: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Search



Languages
Select Interface Language:


Advertising
Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: Search
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Search found 7 matches
ITIL Forum Index
Author Message
  Topic: CAB Conditional Approval
Hoverhead

Replies: 2
Views: 1530

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:21 am   Subject: CAB Conditional Approval
Agreed, I tend to conditionally approved changes if CAB are happy with the details technically. It could be waiting on things like customer approval etc..
  Topic: ITSM Standard Change Windows
Hoverhead

Replies: 2
Views: 1718

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:32 am   Subject: ITSM Standard Change Windows
In addition..Standard changes should not require a conflict check. If you find that this is the case, then this type of change should be a "Normal" change.
  Topic: Unauthorised/retrospective change
Hoverhead

Replies: 3
Views: 1518

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:29 am   Subject: Unauthorised/retrospective change
I agree, you should escalated to the on call duty manager for authorization. If you are a small organization and you don't have this course of escalation, then one should be put in place I guess.
  Topic: Your thoughts around "Routine" Emergency Changes?
Hoverhead

Replies: 4
Views: 5895

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:44 am   Subject: Your thoughts around "Routine" Emergency Changes?
We only allow Emergency changes to be performed in the event of a P1 or P2 incident and this has been incorporated into Servicenow. If they do not have one, then the request is logged under a Normal ...
  Topic: Risk and Impact assessment of all change request
Hoverhead

Replies: 2
Views: 4064

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:38 am   Subject: Risk and Impact assessment of all change request
Define it as Probability x Impact = Risk

Rate probability from 1 -4 (4 being high)

Rate Impact from 1 - 4 (4 being high)

Have a calculation times each other, this could then categorise is eit ...
  Topic: Change Freeze
Hoverhead

Replies: 3
Views: 4542

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:29 am   Subject: Change Freeze
We tend to have a "Restricted Period of Change", rather than doing a change freeze.

Changes can still be submitted through the standard change process but we state that we are operating in a height ...
  Topic: Change Lead Times and CAB
Hoverhead

Replies: 9
Views: 4932

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:54 pm   Subject: Change Lead Times and CAB
Hi,

Suggestions or ideas needed?

I'm in a scenario where we have strict lead times for Minor, Major, significant changes. We have CAB on a Tuesday, so only 1 CAB a week. Lead times for change ...
 
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.