Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

THE ITIL BOOKS

The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:
HERE

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: ShermanHel
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 82
Overall: 220694

People Online:
Visitors: 139
Members: 1
Total: 140 .

Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Search



Languages
Select Interface Language:


Advertising
Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: Search
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Search found 7 matches
ITIL Forum Index
Author Message
  Topic: CAB Conditional Approval
Hoverhead

Replies: 2
Views: 512

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:21 am   Subject: CAB Conditional Approval
Agreed, I tend to conditionally approved changes if CAB are happy with the details technically. It could be waiting on things like customer approval etc..
  Topic: ITSM Standard Change Windows
Hoverhead

Replies: 2
Views: 761

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:32 am   Subject: ITSM Standard Change Windows
In addition..Standard changes should not require a conflict check. If you find that this is the case, then this type of change should be a "Normal" change.
  Topic: Unauthorised/retrospective change
Hoverhead

Replies: 3
Views: 455

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:29 am   Subject: Unauthorised/retrospective change
I agree, you should escalated to the on call duty manager for authorization. If you are a small organization and you don't have this course of escalation, then one should be put in place I guess.
  Topic: Your thoughts around "Routine" Emergency Changes?
Hoverhead

Replies: 4
Views: 4652

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:44 am   Subject: Your thoughts around "Routine" Emergency Changes?
We only allow Emergency changes to be performed in the event of a P1 or P2 incident and this has been incorporated into Servicenow. If they do not have one, then the request is logged under a Normal ...
  Topic: Risk and Impact assessment of all change request
Hoverhead

Replies: 2
Views: 3014

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:38 am   Subject: Risk and Impact assessment of all change request
Define it as Probability x Impact = Risk

Rate probability from 1 -4 (4 being high)

Rate Impact from 1 - 4 (4 being high)

Have a calculation times each other, this could then categorise is eit ...
  Topic: Change Freeze
Hoverhead

Replies: 3
Views: 3464

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:29 am   Subject: Change Freeze
We tend to have a "Restricted Period of Change", rather than doing a change freeze.

Changes can still be submitted through the standard change process but we state that we are operating in a height ...
  Topic: Change Lead Times and CAB
Hoverhead

Replies: 9
Views: 3138

PostForum: Change Management   Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:54 pm   Subject: Change Lead Times and CAB
Hi,

Suggestions or ideas needed?

I'm in a scenario where we have strict lead times for Minor, Major, significant changes. We have CAB on a Tuesday, so only 1 CAB a week. Lead times for change ...
 
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.