Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

THE ITIL BOOKS

The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:
HERE

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: ocatyxon
New Today: 84
New Yesterday: 79
Overall: 220383

People Online:
Visitors: 131
Members: 3
Total: 134 .

Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Search



Languages
Select Interface Language:


Advertising
Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - CMDB CI Status Tracking
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CMDB CI Status Tracking

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Configuration Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cb122
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Oct 02, 2013
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:28 pm    Post subject: CMDB CI Status Tracking Reply with quote

I am pretty new to ITIL and COnfiguration Management, but am trying to learn the key concepts. I know with ITIL the 4th stage out of 5 relates to status tracking of CI's. I understand from asset management the general notion of the lifecycle of an asset. But I am struggling to see what issues / risks are caused if you dont have proper status tracking procedures in place for your CI's. what risks can you face with poor status tracking procedures of CI's? If any?
Back to top
View user's profile
svinjam
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Apr 24, 2015
Posts: 3
Location: Saskatoon, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 8:49 am    Post subject: status is key field for other service management processes Reply with quote

This is how we use it:

We use status tracking to understand the actual state of a CI and when they are related to incidents, changes, problems etc - it helps do a better analysis on the CI.

Example: If a CI status is not in production, the approvals for that change might be different from a CI that has been deployed to production.

If an incident is reported on a CI - the status tells us if its active or decommissioned and users should or should not be using it.

For service catalogue - some of our services are automatically managed based on CI status - if something is decommissioned / not in production anymore - the service goes from published to inactive.

CI status is controlled by change management process to ensure right people are notified and right impact is assessed.

Hope that helps!
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Kranti
Senior Itiler


Joined: Jun 05, 2015
Posts: 59
Location: Hyderabad ,India

PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The biggest risk that you have in not maintaining this CMDB is you loose track of CIs and cannot analyze things in future
_________________
Kranti Kiran Kumar Gedela

Project Manager - SAP

ITIL® Expert
Prince2®
CSM® CSPO® CSP®
PMI® SAP®
Lean Six Sigma Black Belt ®
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Configuration Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops © 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest © 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.