Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

THE ITIL BOOKS

The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:
HERE

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: RamiroCod0
New Today: 39
New Yesterday: 89
Overall: 220596

People Online:
Visitors: 151
Members: 3
Total: 154 .

Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Search



Languages
Select Interface Language:


Advertising
Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Responding To Additional Work
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Responding To Additional Work

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mmc98069
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 11, 2016
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:04 am    Post subject: Responding To Additional Work Reply with quote

Hi Guys First post here. I have an organization that has this rule in place for additional work once you address the original incident:
 "If requested by the same client to do further work than initially requested in the initial ticket and it can be done in that single visit, a new ticket should not be created. The existing ticket should be updated to reflect the additional work undertaken."
I don't believe this is correct as I think a new ticket would need to be created for the additional incident/request. Can someone let me know if I am correct in following ITIL best practices.

mmc98069
Back to top
View user's profile
UKVIKING
Senior Itiler


Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3581
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are confusing tasks and actions with Incident

If there is an Incident, all of the work that is directly related to the Incident - to investigate, diagnose, communicate and resolve - are linked to that incident.

Any other activities that supports the Incident should be in that ticket

The same standards would apply to Requests.

That said, If you have a request to X and the customer says do X, Y, Z, banana, etc and you do the work, you must have a way to track that - regardless of whether the customer is charged, all of that work / tasks / actions can be assigned to that ticket.

If the org is smart or charges for the work you did beyond the required, then, when the request gets reviewed, the additional tasks are there.

Please note ITIL is NOT a standard or a requirements document. It is a framework. ITIL is adopt the framework and adapt to the particular org

ITIL says all incidents and requests should be recorded and managed - how you do that is up to you

Hopefully, this helps you
_________________
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.