Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

THE ITIL BOOKS

The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:
HERE

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: Rafaela455
New Today: 6
New Yesterday: 79
Overall: 214858

People Online:
Visitors: 176
Members: 4
Total: 180 .

Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Search



Languages
Select Interface Language:


Advertising
Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Change success question
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Change success question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
smurphy
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Apr 04, 2014
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 5:49 am    Post subject: Change success question Reply with quote

I would like to get some feedback on the whether you would call this a success or unsuccessful classification.

A change in the network was performed and the steps and new functionality was implemented fine. That all works okay.

However, there was an abnormal result that occurred immediately following the change that caused degradation.

I am being challenged on whether this is a failure to the change or an incident.
Back to top
View user's profile
UKVIKING
Senior Itiler


Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3570
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You need to split hairs

1 - If the change as designed was implemented successfully, then it was a successful change
2 - The degradation to the network service is a fault.

If the analysis of the gfault and the restoration process of whyit degraded points to the change, then this is a architectural question and of course why the change got approved as the risk and impact identified was flawed
_________________
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile
JScratch
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Sep 06, 2016
Posts: 12
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my company this would be a scored as a failure (Introduced Bug/Incident). It was proven to have an unanticipated negative impact.

Black and White to me for this example. But I'm fairly strict on things in my company. This is not to prove people are bad (far from it), its for learning purposes. My company often goes back to change records to find out how something was performed, knowing about this incident that was caused might help prevent the same from happening in the future.

Hope this helps Smile
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.