Long Range Planning

General discussion on all aspects of the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL)
Post Reply

Does your organisations Infrastructure planning take business strategies into account?

Yes
1
50%
No
1
50%
What?
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 2
User avatar
SwissTony
ITIL Expert
ITIL Expert
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: Geneva

Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:13 am

Hi guys....not been around for a while.....& now in need of your opinion regarding long range planning.....


My org has recently completed a long range budget planning exercise. I opened my big mouth to state that no analysis had been done on the business plans in order to create the infrastructure plans. :roll: yes, I know now.

So having made some analysis my assumption are correct in that there is no correlation. Where business project plans increase, infrastructure budgets remain on a slight growth.

2 points of failure for me:
1- Not being pro-active to the business plans
2- Not rtaking into account achitectural strategies, where infra costs should reduce.

Rant over........is your organisation the same?

BRB finishing my presentation on this shite......& firmly closing my big gob.


User avatar
Diarmid
ITIL Expert
ITIL Expert
Posts: 1894
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:00 pm
Location: Helensburgh

Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:06 am

In my opinion, long range planning is too difficult for most organizations and should not be attempted.
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
User avatar
UKVIKING
ITIL Expert
ITIL Expert
Posts: 3639
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: London, UK

Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:24 am

The only long range planning i do is

how far can that person go with me being able to hit them with a rock
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
User avatar
SwissTony
ITIL Expert
ITIL Expert
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: Geneva

Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:05 am

:lol: my initial naivety on the subject has no passed, and I will avoid any involvement in the subject.

Although, I've ended up putting together a proposal to create a set of infrastructure models for small, medium, and large projects based on the objectives and budget of the project. Primarily aimed at only forecasting for the future 12months when the IT Project Portfolio is put together......not sure how the audience will react, but something must be better than going in blind, and purely adding x% on top of last years budget as seems to be the norm.
User avatar
ChrisD
Itiler
Itiler
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:00 pm

Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:27 am

You raise a really good point - if we are to be professional and encourage 'best practice' for IT Service Management, why are some organisation so blind when it comes to Capacity Management? I appreciate that it is very hard to get capacity management right, but in my book you are absolutley right to put your head above the parapet in being pro-active. I hope that your presentation gets a fair hearing ......
User avatar
Cking
Itiler
Itiler
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: North Coast, USA

Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:35 pm

Every few years or so, IT lays out an infrastructure roadmap that incorporates not only foreseeable capacity increases, but also fundamental technology changes or upgrades. Often times this turns into a domino effect of internally initiated projects that will span several years to budget and complete.

Costs are estimated and adjusted year to year for the budget planning process, and then the budgeting team determines how far down the roadmap can be planned for the coming year.

It doesn't directly consider business plans, but the roadmap usually comes about when we recognize approaching constraints - no more slots for additional switch blades - limited slots in the storage frame for additional disk ... licenses no longer available (or supported) for version of sw in use... (ie. cluster, virtual...)
User avatar
SwissTony
ITIL Expert
ITIL Expert
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: Geneva

Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:14 am

In the end my hands were somewhat politically tied.... :roll:

The results showed an investment of 6% of total project budgeting going directly for hardware purchases next year - although as Infra budgeting did not take business plans in to account, that percentage varies over the next few years, and will need to be addressed.

Finally, I included the proposal to create a set of models for small, medium, large projects - which will then have differences for new, replace, and extension projects. This system would be used for a 12month forecast, based on detail project plans.

Certainly not an exact science, however, it will provide a quantifiable forecast........against our current situation of, well, nothing other than finger-in-the-air guesstimates.
Post Reply