RFC required for removing servers from a pool?

Discuss and debate ITIL Change Management issues
Post Reply
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:50 pm

Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:20 pm

What are your thoughts on requiring an RFC when a device needs to be removed from a pool? I know there has been discussion around if it is in response to break fix then it could be an incident while other orgs consider it a change. From my current perspective we have a very weak incident process and this work isn't always being tracked via an incident or a change request. Would you also consider it a standard change or a normal change?

Personally, as much as it pains me, I would like to see it as an RFC done as a normal change with the proper risk and impact.

User avatar
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:00 pm
Location: Nova Scotia

Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:51 am

For us an RFC is required. If a change is being made to production then an RFC is required. Just because that works for us doesn't mean that's the best policy for you.

Here incidents are used to log production issues, RFC's are used for production changes. Sometimes 1 is related to the other and are linked together. i.e. An incident is logged for a production issue and an RFC is logged to correct the production issue. The incident and RFC are linked together. But again that's what works for us.
Sandy Spears
Change Manager

"Change Manager" - The person people love to hate!
Post Reply